Doug Ford's power play on Toronto has implications far and wide

So here we are with a discussion around Section 33 of the Charter of Rights, known as the Notwithstanding Clause. Not a gripping debate in many circles, except that it should be. Its usage could have a profound impact on Canadians.

In a nutshell, it permits a government to set aside a court ruling on the constitutionality for up to 5 years (pending legislation to repair/fix what was judged, or an election). So if a court rules an act is unconstitutional, a government may invoke section 33 and disregard the court ruling - so that the offending law remain in effect.

What?!

Further, Section 33 applies (when invoked) on Section 2, and section 7-15 of the Charter. Meaning, section 2's fundamental rights could be swept aside by a bully Premier. If you're keeping track, Section 2 is where your right of everything you hold dear is nicely housed.

A union's right to strike, bargain in good faith, even "exist" are threatened by S. 33. But wait! That's not all. That thing that protects your freedom of faith and free speech? That's also Section 2. Freedom to peacefully protest? Section 2.

Oh this is all overkill, fear mongering.

Is it?

There are campaigners that have worked hard to undo union strength in Canada. The Rand Formula is key to union strength and forbids 'open shop' and anti-union "right to work" laws from being enacted here.

But now Doug Ford has served notice that his fight with Toronto may not be the only time that Section 33 is invoked. All he has to do now is table right-to-work laws in Ontario, have a court strike them down as unconstitutional, then pull the notwithstanding trigger.

Its over.

This is the fight the far right has been itching for. Next time a rising star of the progressive side emerges, vote for it and undo this mess.

Your move, Ontario.

my 2 bits

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Predictable, but sickening nonetheless: BC Liberals tap dance on fuel price.

Image
To believe BC Liberal rhetoric on fuel prices in BC, the NDP are responsible for the highest gas prices in North America. Facts however, tell another story. What are the BC Liberals asking for in this narrative? Subsidized gas? Because the taxation regime in place is largely untouched since they left office. While it is true that the carbon tax in BC went up by a penny, that's hardly the explanation for the recent dramatic jump in price. There are several factors. Regional governments, city halls, transit authorities all have a hand in adding layers of taxation to fuel costs in BC. To believe the BC Liberal version of this: the NDP is responsible for 100% of this tax burden. What's even more asinine is the failure to build Kinder Morgan that the NDP opposes is also responsible for this fuel price overload. Would someone please tell the BC Liberals that the expanded Kinder Morgan project is for export only? The Alberta based tar sands fuel that ends up in our vehic
Read more

Lauren Semple - for the future we need

Image
Today, I’m happy and honoured to offer my unqualified endorsement to Lauren Semple for the Federal NDP nomination to the Nanaimo-Ladysmith ballot this fall. I have worked with Lauren in the community for 4 years now and I have only known her to be a tireless and fearless advocate on human rights and worker rights. In my background in the labour movement, Lauren and I share a similar vision of ‘what we demand for ourselves, we wish for all.’ As Lauren is the past President of Nanaimo Pride Society, this extends to all corners in our society as she championed the cause for equality; for women, for LGBTQ folks, justice for First Nations and many other marginalized peoples. Voters have stark choices to make in the 2019 election. Voting for Lauren Semple is a vote to defend our coast, champion fair taxes and adequate housing. With the same old corruption, the same old pandering to the 1%, the same old catering to Howe/Young Street while ignoring the main street and our neighborhoods,
Read more

No Keith. Do not play the #bothsides card

Image
Just when the MSM was about to get serious about some honest reporting, this egg was laid by senior political reporter playing the 'both sides' card. Almost on cue. No Keith. The NDP doesn't get the blame for travel expenses that Craig James and Gary Lenz traded signatures on. It was unknown enough that it took Speaker Daryl Plecas by surprise when he dug around for the information. This 'both sides' narrative is a BC Liberal talking point because they know how ethically exposed they are already; this makes matters worse merely a week ahead of the Nanaimo byelection they're poised to lose. Now with this stink out there, it feeds into the narrative that BC Liberals are the party of crony capitalism and insiderism; so lets throw some mud at the NDP and make them to blame too. Nothing in the #plecasreport implicates the NDP government or any of its MLA's or cabinet ministers. How embarrassing.
Read more